The front of each card is a
multi-colored illustration, in either a horizontal or vertical format,
which shows a picture of "one of the most interesting specimens of the
animal kingdom". Beneath the illustration is listed the common name of
the species (at least, as of 1890) and, below that, the "classical
appellation".
Each card has a wide, solid-color
border, which I've found to be most commonly greyish on certain cards
and kind of a pale, dull tan on the others. HOWEVER....there do seem to
be variations in these colors, but whether they're due to differences
in the original printing or color transformations that have occurred
since, due to chemical exposure, etc., I can't really say. I have a
small number of cards with a distinctly pale blue or blue-green border
and some that I would call a dull pink border. In several cases (#10
- Angora Goat, #11 - Asiatic Elephant, #12
- Gnu, and #41 - Orang-Outang, I have acquired (or
have seen) cards in both the common color and the seemingly scarcer
variety, and have shown both. I'd be interested in hearing from anybody
who has more definitive information in this area.
The back of each card contains
identical text, in a vertical format printed in a shade of blue, with
the left side containing the standard "Grind
Your Coffee At Home" explaining the
benefits of do-it-yourself coffee grinding, and the right side
explaining what the series represents. (See example.)
These cards were also issued in an
album format as "Arbuckles' Album of Illustrated Natural History", available from
the company as a mail-order premium. "Cards" cut from this album may
sometimes be found, although the album format didn't lend itself to
this practice as readily as the State Maps and National
Geographical series, since the "cards" tended to
overlap each other on each album page. They are easily identifiable
since the text on the back of the "card" doesn't match the illustration
on the front and runs off the edges of the card.
* Although
Arbuckles' claimed for themselves a copyright date of 1890 for this
series, the illustrations on which the cards were based were not
originally commissioned by Arbuckles', but rather had been previously
published in one or more natural history books, at least as far back as
1861. I've added scans of 46 of these earlier
drawings to each corresponding card's page, for comparison with the
Arbuckle version. (Only Opossum, Zebu, Leopard, and Indian Rhinoceros
are not accounted for at this point.)
Please click here for additional information
(and a bit of speculation).
|
|